Edmund Tirbutt on Financial Media Case Studies and Storytelling – MPAF Episode 4

Positive Stories. Case studies and videos could be the way to overcome the poor perception consumers have of the financial services industry.

In Episode 4 of the Marketing Protection and Finance Podcast – I talk to journalist Edmund Tirbutt.

Edmund is a freelance journalist and writer and has covered financial services topics for the last 27 years.

His articles are always painstakingly researched and hard-hitting.

A one-time semi-pro stand-up comedian, he’s recently started doing comedy again, performing alongside world-renowned comedians like Mike Wozniak and John Maloney.

Listen as Edmund talks about his early days as a media champion trying to get declined claims paid. Hear his views on how we use humour in financial services communications. He asks whether seminars in the workplace the key to future market growth.

Edmund Tirbutt on Financial Media Case Studies and Storytelling

Edmund feels that positive financial case studies are key to improving the public’s view of financial services. Listen as he explains what works and how advisers can talk to the media to showcase their positive stories.

Don’t miss an episode of the MPAF Podcast – subscribe now.

Subscribe on iTunes

Subscribe by RSS Feed

Now it’s your turn:

If you enjoyed this episode – Edmund Tirbutt on Financial Media Case Studies and Storytelling – please leave a comment or a review on iTunes. And if you know anyone who would enjoy the show – please share it with them. You can use the buttons below to share on social media.

3 Unsurprising Facts Unchanged in 20 years of Protection Insurance

How long have you worked in financial services?

It’s amazing how technology has changed but the communications challenges we face are the same, don’t you think?

3 Unsurprising Facts Unchanged in 20 years of Protection Insurance

I often get asked to speak at local adviser events. A popular topic is sharing marketing ideas about how advisers can grow their businesses.

An old colleague,  who I’ve not seen in over 10 years, recently invited me to speak at his lunchtime workshop. On the guest list I saw another couple of names I recognised from my early days in the industry. From the 1990s.

Speaking about growing the protection market is fascinating. Talking to people with whom I had similar conversations  two decades ago even more so.

When I thought about what I would talk about, I realised that some things have not changed at all.

  • People still do not think that they need protection insurance and even those that do, think of it as a grudge buy
  • They think that it is too expensive
  • They believe that insurance companies will try hard to find a way to decline claims.

Deeply engrained in consumers’ minds, these views prevail despite evidence to the contrary.

On top of that, apart from a surge of critical illness sales in the late 1990s and early 2000s, “flat” is how you would describe the protection market.

Yet, the way we do business has changed completely. Back when I started, we enjoyed our own telephones on desks for the first time. And HR departments were as worried that people would waste their time on the phone to friends as they are about them spending time on Facebook now.

No individual PCs, no internet and no mobile phones. We faxed hand calculated and typed quotations to advisers.

Sales consultants travelled the country with sacks full of 2p pieces for phoning the office from public call boxes. We advertised in the trade press. But unless you were in London you didn’t get your copy of the trade papers until the following week.

Now we have information overload on the Internet. Communication by mobile, Skype, iMessage, Facetime and video conference.

We can get instant quotations.

There are more channels for marketing communications across hundreds of TV stations, electronic bill boards and ads within apps.

And social media opens up a different way of engaging clients.

All this happened in less than 20 years. As a marketing person it’s fascinated me to see these new methods of communication develop.

But, despite technological developments beyond the dreams of most science fiction writers, the same three reasons why people don’t buy protection insurance prevail now as then.

Overcoming those objections requires the same approach. I’ve always believed a “Face to Face conversation” to handle those objections best approach. Twenty years ago. And today.

Of course to talk face to face we no longer need to be in the same room. Now we can talk “FaceTime to FaceTime“. Or “Skype to Skype“.

The digital technology revolution hasn’t changed the way people feel about protection. But we can use it to encourage more people into face to face meetings. That is where future protection market growth will come from.

Now it’s your turn:

What’s changed for the better over the last 20 years of protection insurance? What would you still like to see change? Please leave a comment or share a link to your own article.

What use are great protection claims statistics if no one knows about them?

There have been some great headlines recently shouting about how many protection claims we paid last year.

Here’s one from Money Marketing Magazine.

“Protection industry paid out £3.1bn in 2013”

And another from Financial Adviser magazine.

“ABI: Insurers paid out 97% of protection claims”

Undoubtedly these are great protection claims statistics. As Dougie Grant from Aegon says in the Financial Adviser piece, “The figures released by the ABI today shatter the illusion that insurance companies don’t pay claims and demonstrate how important it is to have cover in place.”

You can’t argue with that.

Protection Claims Statistics

But as great as these figures are it’s like hundreds of trees falling in the forest. You won’t hear them fall unless you are there to see them. The public still think that protection providers actively try to avoid paying claims. In fact they think that we pay out less than 40%. And articles in the Daily Mail and features on BBC Watchdog fuel that perception.

Only a very few people will go looking for great claims statistics like this. Confirmation bias means that they’ll seek out the negative articles that confirm their belief that we don’t pay.

Articles like this are great for an adviser to whip out when a client  raises the question about a companies willingness to pay. But main stream audiences aren’t seeing them.

So what are we doing to promote these amazing claims statistics? Where are the case studies with claimants? Where are the video testimonials from clients? Where are the interviews with people holding their cheques?

Statistics alone will not change deeply rooted perceptions. We need to tell the stories of the people whose lives have been affected.

Or better still let them tell their stories themselves.

Do you agree? Leave a comment below and share your thoughts.